Skip to content

Home
From the Blog
- Tales
- Thoughts
- Teachings
- Touts
- Treatments
From the Atelier
From the Media
From the Store
From the Others
Getting in Touch

Home
From the Blog
- Tales
- Thoughts
- Teachings
- Touts
- Treatments
From the Atelier
From the Media
From the Store
From the Others
Getting in Touch

RM0.00 0 Basket

Malaysian Judiciary

A Citizen’s Guide to Judicial Review in Malaysia | Part Two

19 July 2024 by Fahri Azzat

In this Part, we consider the accepted legal reasons for challenging the validity of public authority decisions, actions and policities.

Categories Teachings, Legal Awareness Tags Nestle Products Sdn Bhd v Mahkamah Perusahaan Malaysia [2013] 8 CLJ 586, Projek Lebuhraya Usahasama Bhd v Majlis Perbandaran Subang Jaya [2016] 9 CLJ 238, R Rama Chandran v Industrial Court of Malaysia & Anor [1997] 1 CLJ 147, Judicial Review, The Edge Communications Sdn Bhd v Ketua Setiausaha Kementerian Dalam Negeri & Anor [2016] 1 LNS 1845, Illegality, Irrationality, Statutory Judicial Review, Rokiah Mohd Noor v Menteri Perdagangan Dalam negeri Koperasi & Kepenggunaan Malaysia & Ors [2018] 5 CLJ 162, Malaysian Judiciary, Indira Gandhi Mutho v Pengarah Jabatan Agama Islam Perak & Ors and Other Appeal [2018] 3 CLJ 145, Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corp [1948] 1 KB 223 Leave a comment

Get in Touch

fahri(at)fromthebarstool.life

Fahri, Azzat & Co.

From the Atelier

The Curated Sections

From the Others

Getting in Touch

Get in Touch

fahri(at)fromthebarstool.life

Fahri, Azzat & Co.

From the Atelier

From the Others

Getting in Touch

© 2024 Fahri Azzat. All rights reserved.

From the Bar Stool
The Blog
From the Atelier
From the Media
Contact